Commuter Rail = 1/3 less traffic for Utah? Only if this is a fairy tale.
In a recent Standard Examiner Letter To the Editor advocating the building of a commuter rail system, Richard Gallison claims that:
"Long ago there was a news item published in this paper that stated that cities with a good commuter transportation had 32 percent less traffic on their highways."
Umm.. Yeah. Long ago in a Galaxy Far, Far Away?
The reality is that most rail systems carry only roughly 2% of the traffic in an area. Indeed, only a handful of large, population-dense cities have rail systems handling more than 10% of commuters (Boston, Chicago, New York, Washington, Philadelphia). Furthermore, of those who would ride a new rail system, not all would be former car commuters. A rather large portion would be former bus riders.
Sunday, March 06, 2005
Technology, Politics, and Economics.
Links
- Back to Main
- My resumé
- Uresk Networks
- Programming Forums
- JSF Resources
- AJAX Resources
- Poolitics
- Email Me
Previous Posts
- "More Trustworthy and Decent Americans"? Orrin Ha...
- External Costs In an earlier entry, I mentioned...
- Measures of the US Government's Fiscal Policy Unde...
- H2R BMW recently showed off its new hydrogen-po...
- 313 Billionaires If you are reading this and ha...
- New Punishment for Bad Companies? Finally! It l...
- Time to quit using Growth as our secret weapon? ...
- Conditions for A Revolution in the United States?...
- Where are all the White Collar Jobs? According ...

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home